Skip to content
Hodl Advisory

Advisory packages

Choose the right starting point.

Start with a focused diagnosis, a complete target architecture, or ongoing judgment alongside the work. Each package leaves you and your team with a clearer system and a practical next move.

An independent diagnosis of one defined current or planned workflow, with prioritized findings and practical next actions.

What it helps you accomplish

Turn a system that feels hard to judge into a clear set of findings, priorities, and next actions your team can discuss and own.

An independent review challenges the evidence, resolves who owns each decision, and leaves you with a defendable decision artifact—not just another opinion.

When it fits

The initiative is real enough to inspect, but roles, context, memory, evidence, tools, handoffs, permissions, approvals, or failure points still feel unclear.

What you receive

  • executive summary and architecture view
  • findings organised by impact and evidence
  • review of roles, context, handoffs, controls, and authority
  • prioritised next actions
  • one written clarification round

The starting price assumes one bounded primary workflow. Final scope and quote follow the fit call.

Handoff and further work

A short call to walk through the written Review and clarify its findings is included.

If you want to work through wider trade-offs, stakeholder questions, or next-step decisions, an optional 60-minute decision session is €500.

Sample Reviews

These sample Reviews are based on recurring problems I have encountered in my own systems and work. They show the representative structure and depth of the deliverable.

Sample 01 / Planned system

A team planning its first portfolio assistant

One assistant is expected to research, remember rules, recommend actions, request approval, act, and verify the result. The Review identifies what must be separated, what can be prototyped first, and why execution should remain manual.

View sample Review ↗
Sample 02 / Active system

A team with an active but unreliable workflow

Timeouts, retries, callbacks, and conflicting state make it impossible to prove exactly what happened. The Review identifies the first repairs: stable operation identity, authoritative state, safe stopping, and clear lifecycle ownership.

View sample Review ↗

A target design for how the workflow, systems, AI, and human decisions should work together.

What it helps you accomplish

Align your team around responsibilities, specialist roles, context and knowledge, evidence and data flows, tools, artifacts, controls, review, escalation, and human authority.

When it fits

A diagnosis is not enough. The team needs a coherent target design and staged path before committing to serious implementation.

What you receive

  • discovery and target architecture map
  • responsibility, role, context, knowledge, artifact and data-flow design
  • deterministic controls, review, escalation and human-authority model
  • handoff, ownership and risk register
  • staged implementation plan, design review and final debrief

Working format

The engagement includes a discovery call, a design review call, the final Blueprint PDF, and a debrief with your team.

The first 50% payment starts the engagement. The remaining 50% is due after the design review and before final delivery.

Sample Blueprint case studyBased on problems and design decisions from my own experience. It demonstrates the structure of the deliverable; a paid Blueprint is designed around your system and connected scope.
View the Blueprint case study ↗

Architectural review and decision support that stays close to an evolving initiative.

What it helps you accomplish

Keep important choices visible, challenge assumptions before they harden, and preserve a coherent direction while your team builds.

When it fits

The initiative is already moving and difficult decisions will continue as the work changes. Cadence and scope are tailored after the fit call.

What you receive

  • an agreed review cadence
  • focused architecture and decision reviews
  • a maintained decision log with owners and rationale
  • written recommendations and next checkpoints
  • direct challenge on choices that materially shape the system

Timing and cost

From €2,500/month ?→ . The exact cadence, review volume, access, and response expectations are defined in the written scope.

Independent, founder-led work

One person from the first evidence read through the final recommendation.

I perform the Review or Blueprint myself. I am not there to replace your domain specialists or sell the implementation afterward. My role is to challenge where their answers, the system architecture and the operating reality meet.

Why I work this way → About

Compare packages

Compare packages

QuestionArchitecture ReviewArchitecture BlueprintOngoing Advisory
Best starting pointOne defined workflow needs diagnosisA team needs a target design to build fromAn active initiative needs continuing judgment
Primary outcomePrioritised findings and next actionsArchitecture map and staged build pathClear decisions and maintained direction
Typical duration7 working days15 working days; discovery, design review and debrief includedMonthly, with an agreed cadence
PriceFrom €2,000 ?→ From €7,500 ?→ From €2,500/month ?→

Next step

Not sure which package fits? Bring me the workflow.

Tell me what you are trying to improve, where it stands, and what feels difficult or unclear. We’ll use the Free Fit Call to confirm the right package, scope, or next step.

Free Fit Call ↗